| 1. |
The community's acceptance and support for OCA's
desire to build a larger scale market rate tower than zoning would
allow was based on it being coupled with the CUNY Graduate and Faculty
Housing.
|
| 2. |
The promised community benefit does not exist.
The community has no guarantee that after the developer builds the
market rate tower there will ever be a community benefit as promised on
the adjoining site.
|
| 3. |
The variance granted continually references
Graduate and Faculty Housing. Every letter of previous support by local
represntatives refernced the Graduate and Faculty Housing.
|
| 4. |
The Developer's proposal to build a higher
density undergraduate dormitory is contrary to what was sold to the
community and it would alter the character and quiet nature of the
neighborhood.
|
| 5. |
A higher density undergraduate dormitory is a
vastly different population than what was presented in the original
Environmental Assesment Statement. The developer should not have the
benefit afforded by this represntation among others when the conditions
either do not exist or have significantly changed.
|